Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neistat Brothers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. New references added, withdrawn by nominator (non-admin closure) &mdash; Music1201  talk  02:09, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Neistat Brothers

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Puff piece article about vloggers brother, who is not referenced at all. All refs point to Casey Neistat. Fails WP:BIO. scope_creep (talk) 10:51, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist  (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 10:53, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist  (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 10:53, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

 References
 * Keep – Passes WP:GNG / WP:BASIC per my WP:BEFORE searches. Below are several sources about the brothers and their works. North America1000 02:14, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
 * The Neistat brothers’ handmade films make the big time. The Day.
 * HBO's 'Neistat Brothers': Musings worth meditating on. The Washington Post.
 * The Neistat Brothers Hit the Big Time. GQ.
 * New Provocateurs: Casey and Van Neistat. New York.
 * The Neistat Brothers -- TV Review. The Hollywood Reporter.
 * A Satisfying Season of Neistat Brothers Home Movies. KXAS-TV.
 * 'The Neistat Brothers': A Cool Thing. PopMatters.
 * The Conversation: HBO's Home Movie Hit. ABC News.
 * HBO’s ‘Neistat Brothers’ Left Me Speechless. Variety. (Short article)


 * Comment Seems to be genuine. Excellent work North America1000 Seems to genuine, not another celeb puff piece which I thought from the sources and the search I conducted. Thanks North America1000 . Withdrawn by nominator. scope_creep (talk)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.