Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neldë


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete all.  Singu larity  06:23, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Neldë

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Not notable Andareed (talk) 08:21, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * A google search of the author (Arelius Gruffud) reveals only 2-3 hits.
 * The listed website (http://www.nelde.pbwiki.com/) has no content.
 * Comment You may want to bundle the several related articles in this nomination. See Special:Whatlinkshere/Neldë. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 08:24, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Also note that there's an . —Disavian (talk/contribs) 08:25, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Done. Andareed (talk) 08:34, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages because they all relate to the article in question:

Andareed (talk) 08:32, 19 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete - I'm having trouble finding any sources for any of this, so IMO it pretty clearly fails WP:N and WP:V. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 08:38, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete all These do not appear to reference a notable work of fiction. JavaTenor (talk) 10:27, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete all nn and relies on a link to a public Wiki. I can't find any reliable sources so most likely original research so fails WP:NOR.  Sting_au   Talk  12:52, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete all per nom (as the original -er of this article) Toddst1 (talk) 14:18, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete all I can't find any indication that these works have been published, though the fact that the title(s?) of the work(s?) isn't mentioned anywhere in the articles makes this difficult. I note that the articles have trouble deciding whether the author's first name is Arelius or Aurelius, but neither search picks up anything bilbiographic. The one story on the linked wikipage is marked as a first draft. In short, by all indications, fails WP:BK. To be honest, the articles read like worldbuilding notes by the author, which is fine and well, but that belongs on HIS wiki not this one. —Quasirandom (talk) 17:54, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete all The author has not made changes to indicate context of significance, so the whole set will be a work of fiction of non importance. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:08, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Toss them all into a fiery volcano: One article for this unpublished, unabashedly explicit LOtR ripoff would be too much, let alone a raft of them. Fails WP:BK, WP:OR, WP:V and probably WP a few others too.    RGTraynor  22:50, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect Eothain to Éothain, Delete all others per nom. Tevildo (talk) 13:15, 23 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.