Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neles


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  MBisanz  talk 15:33, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Neles

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A good example of WP:TOOSOON and WP:MAYBENEVER. The company started operation on July 1, 2020. The article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:ORGCRIT. The subject lacks multiple independent secondary sources providing significant coverage. Per WP:SIGCOV: ""Significant coverage" addresses the topic directly and in detail". WP:BEFORE revealed nothing beyond WP:ROUTINE coverage that would contribute to demonstrating WP:N.  // Timothy ::  talk  21:27, 14 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy ::  talk  21:27, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy ::  talk  21:27, 14 August 2020 (UTC)


 * keep It's new just because it's been split from two major companies Metso and Outotec. Many articles exist in the Finnish newspaper of record Helsingin Sanomat and the financial newspaper Kauppalehti. Currently, Finnish newspapers cover a Swedish hostile takeover attempt of the company and subsequent massive buys from Valmet. --Pudeo (talk) 21:45, 14 August 2020 (UTC)


 * keep Neles is one of the largest companies in Finland. Company was officially formed in July 1, 2020, but it was before Metso. Neles has many reliable sources in Finnish (Helsingin Sanomat)  (Yle) and many else. I just used English sources so people can understand them. Company is also in OMX Helsinki 25 (article isn't updated). So Neles has significant coverage in reliable sources in Finnish. –AinScept (talk) 22:03, 14 August 2020 (UTC)


 * I've added reliable sources to article, like Kauppalehti, Yle and Reuters. –AinScept (talk) 13:29, 21 August 2020 (UTC)


 * comment I have improved a lot this article when you put the deletion discussion, like adding reliable Finnish sources to article. What you think now about or should there be even more sources in the article? Sources what i added are very significant in Finland. -AinScept (talk) 13:44, 25 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:27, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 04:30, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. I appreciate the efforts AinScept and Pudeo put into finding sources. Many of the new sources added (or those I found) are borderline routine coverage or press release, but I agree there's barely enough sufficient coverage here to meet WP:NCORP. For example: this is more detailed than what would be expected of a routine coverage. If the article is not kept, I would also support a drafity option given the potential of this company as an alternative to deletion, provided that editors are interested to improve this article. --Dps04 (talk) 16:46, 30 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.