Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nelson Ifeanyichukwu Josiah Iluno


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 02:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Nelson Ifeanyichukwu Josiah Iluno

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject of the article fails WP:GNG and WP:AUTHOR. Sources provided are self-published and primary sources Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 10:38, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Subject of the article is not wholly faulted by WP:GNG and WP:AUTHOR. Sources [3] and [4] are not self-published and primary sources.105.112.33.30 (talk) 08:57, 19 January 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 105.112.33.30 (talk) 08:54, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 10:42, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 10:42, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 10:42, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  20:55, 25 January 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as non-notable. The nominator is correct in noting that most of the article's sources are either self-published or primary. Even the article from the Guardian (November 29) is largely just a rehash of statements made by several clerics at a "debate".  Although not self-published, it is still primary and, in any event, is not about the subject.  NewYorkActuary (talk) 00:31, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 16:09, 1 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.