Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nem Um Talvez


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 16:48, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Nem Um Talvez

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. Unsourced since 2009. Vmavanti (talk) 23:21, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:31, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:34, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment: Two book sources now added, though both relate to the 1970 Miles Davis session; I'd like to see more supporting references regarding subsequent recordings (especially to support assertions such as another version being "well-known"). If such are not forthcoming, a merge to Live-Evil_(Miles_Davis_album) might be appropriate? AllyD (talk) 09:39, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep: AllyD has added sources from books. I've added one as well by Richard Cook (journalist) which is notable in my opinion. Lunar Clock (talk) 23:09, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 15:02, 7 April 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buidhe 21:56, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep: Sources added by AllyD & Lunar Clock are good enough for the article to be kept. ASTIG😎  (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 14:41, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment: The current sourcing certainly isn't enough for the article to be kept. The Morton one contains less than half a sentence. The So What book contains a few sentences on legal problems. I can't access the It's about that Time book, but all it sources in the article is the sentence "On the record, it is wrongly attributed to Miles Davis". The relevant criteria here are WP:NSONG – in particular, "a standalone article is appropriate only when there is enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged to articles about an artist or album". Unless more information can be sourced, a redirect to / merge with Live-Evil (Miles Davis album) is therefore appropriate. EddieHugh (talk) 17:37, 17 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.