Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nemesis Enforcer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep as per consensus. Pastor Theo (talk) 00:32, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Nemesis Enforcer

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Minor character, minor toy. No claim to, let alone evidence of, notability, nor citations to reliable sources. --EEMIV (talk) 19:56, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Just started editing the page. Many of the charters are minor, but he had a major role in the original Movie and in the Comic he appeared. Many of the G.I. Joe pages being added have less information than this. I do not Support a delete. Sgetz (talk) 20:23, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per Sgetz. --Ridge Runner (formerly known as Flash176) (talk) 22:33, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  23:52, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * merge to some appropriate list of charcters in the franchise If there are similar pages with less information, merge them also. This should be the default solution for characters . DGG (talk) 08:14, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep as it is a decent article for the character in question. It has more information than many of the basic characters, and is a good starting point for others to build on. It has several references that show the character has some notability. 72.237.4.150 (talk) 18:44, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep as I said before, as I was the person that reinstate the article, I think there is enough material on it to keep it. Also, we have a Keep from Ridge Runner above. Sgetz (talk) 22:26, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep I think there is enough on this article for it to stay. 24.58.239.42 (talk) 22:27, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.