Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nemotek Technologie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus.  Sandstein  07:03, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Nemotek Technologie

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Spam article for non-notable tech firm. References are press releases. &mdash; Chowbok  ☠  02:47, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 16:25, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 16:26, 18 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Meh. The claim that all refs are press releases is without merit. in  EE Times for instance is not a press release, and neither are   . Also having the first Class 10 clean room in Africa is somewhat notable in itself. This is a small, privately-held (although apparently with some Moroccan gov't participation) and specialized foundry making chips for digital camera modules, so not getting the kind of coverage that bigger fish like TSMC get, but even for those you don't expect product reviews because they're not rolling their own designs. News coverage other than press releases exists, but what I find puzzling is the lack of information as to which camera manufacturers they make products for. FuFoFuEd (talk) 18:48, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:11, 25 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep meets WP:CORP. i see sufficient coverage in gnews . LibStar (talk) 00:48, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.