Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neo-Catholicism (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  08:52, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Neo-Catholicism
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete and redirect to Traditionalist Catholic. This doesn't seem to be anything other than a term that traditionalists use for all the other Catholics, so there is nothing interesting to say about them other than that they agree with what's described in Catholicism and don't agree with what's described in Traditionalist Catholic. Cal Engime (talk) 14:52, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Cal Engime (talk) 14:52, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Since it is a pejorative term used by Traditionalist Catholics about their opponents, a "redirect to Traditionalist Catholic" is probably not a good idea. Johnbod (talk) 00:12, 4 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Support - agree with statements made in nomination. Should just be deleted outright or merged into Traditionalist Catholic.Marauder40 (talk) 15:27, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete or Merge This is a pejorative term, never likely to be accepted by those who are supposed to be Neo-Catholics, and (as the article does not say) entirely a term used in America, and by very few there I imagine. The article is extremely confusing, as are some of the sources I looked at, but the term might be worth a sentence or two somewhere. Johnbod (talk) 00:12, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Conservatism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:19, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:19, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.