Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neo-Tawantinsuyo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 15:49, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Neo-Tawantinsuyo

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Non-notable concept, on google it just comes up a handfull web forum postings. ORish articles that argues that there would be any linkage between bilingual education and restoring the Inca empire. Soman (talk) 16:15, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

There article could, indeed, be more precise in its description and should, perhaps, have a different title. To call it a movement might even be an exaggeration. Though it still stands that there are numerous politicians in the region who would actually like to restore at least four Latin American countries to a unified native state. A logical start for them is to reintroduce the indigenous tongues to the mainstream.

It's a movement without any clear leader, and without anyone really calling it a movement. Though more of a natural trend, there is something there.

Tawantinsuyo means "land of the four regions," and the name of the Inca's (deified emperor's) empire. It's an appropriate name for a large country with four regions to it. Four modern countries have large numbers of politicians and academics who'd like to merge their states into one so that they can move to reclaim their history and aggrandize their power. Though in the minority (with the exception of Bolivia), these people and their concept of a unified Andean state, based on a common Inca and Aymara heritage, are notable in that they represent the strengthening of Amerindian movements in the Americas and that they can transcend political parties while still acting as one.

TH —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nanib (talk • contribs) 20:12, 11 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment, a reading of WP:OR and WP:CRYSTALBALL might be useful for understanding some basics of Wikipedia. --Soman (talk) 12:31, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:06, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latin America-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 01:53, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete If this were a popular movement, let alone a notable popular movement, you'd expect there to be some independent sources. Edward321 (talk) 01:41, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.