Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neo-imagism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  17:41, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Neo-imagism

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I can't find any evidence that this is an actual, notable literary movement. The article's full of hedges like "little known" and such. Crystallina (talk) 03:50, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete- Not sourced, and no convincing assertion of notability. Reyk  YO!  04:40, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete- according to Google, the word is used rarely and moreover probably in another meaning than described in the article.--Ioannes Pragensis (talk) 12:29, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.   -- Xymmax  So let it be written   So let it be done  09:50, 26 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.