Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neo-prub


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Rlendog (talk) 20:25, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Neo-prub

 * – ( View AfD View log )

WP:MADEUP, non-notable neologism per WP:NEO, zero mentions online outside of this article and its mirrors. Prod contested by IP sockpuppet. Gurt Posh (talk) 08:27, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - Gurt Posh - I'm a bit puzzled as to why you didn't just leave it as a WP:PROD. The contesting of a prod (by anyone, IP or registered user) does not mean it automatically gets to go to AFD, it simply becomes something for the reviewing admin to consider before taking any action. I suspect most admins would agree this article is a speedy candidate. (I've voted now so I can't speedy it myself.) Manning (talk) 11:57, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment - Any contested PROD must be sent to AFD, and not simply have the PROD added back; see WP:CONTESTED. -- Whpq (talk) 15:35, 18 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete as something made up in one day. Google returns 6 hits, two related to Wikipedia and 4 non-English. There is no such thing as "Neo-Prub." Hoax. Carrite (talk) 14:50, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Clearly fails WP:NEO. Qrsdogg (talk) 18:02, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 23:40, 15 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete as complete horse-hockey. -- Whpq (talk) 15:35, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.