Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neo-relativity


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 20:50, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

Neo-relativity

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Neologism related to OPERA experiment speed of light findings from unpublished sci-fi author Rajagopal Kamath Khu  kri  06:59, 6 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. The context in which the subject is found in the literature (scholar and books) is hardly sufficient to have a serious article it about here. DVdm (talk) 07:17, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:ORIGINAL. Inks.LWC (talk) 07:31, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unsourced, fails to establish notability, and academic notability seems doubtful to me because it looks dubious from a physics standpoint (tachyons are well-understood and don't require overturning relativity). --Christopher Thomas (talk) 08:52, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:56, 6 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep.A new idea based on the results of neutrino experiment. The authror/editor should expand it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sldgehmr (talk • contribs) 00:04, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note to closing admin The above user was blocked as a sock account of the article creator. Inks.LWC (talk) 05:37, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:OR. The neutrino experiment is very recent and the faster than light result very much unconfirmed and unlikely. There has not been sufficient time for any new theories to have become accepted by the physics community and hence no reliable sources are available to support this article. Polyamorph (talk) 08:57, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:OR, and WP:MADEUP. - The Bushranger One ping only 20:04, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable neologism at this point and per the arguments mentioned above already--Kmhkmh (talk) 09:33, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete unsourced OR. Gandalf61 (talk) 12:16, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Scope for improvement — Preceding unsigned comment added by 111.92.83.251 (talk) 19:04, 10 October 2011 (UTC) — 111.92.83.251 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Note to closing admin - Per WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Gameseeker/Archive, this IP address is likely a sock of the article creator. --Christopher Thomas (talk) 07:50, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 06:08, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - unsourced, fails notability, etc. See WP:GNG. Chris (talk) 21:04, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.