Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NeoExtreme

NeoExtreme
Not notable. --fvw *  22:25, 2005 Jan 3 (UTC)

Why is this up for deletion? Nothing is wrong.
 * Unsigned comment left by User:66.176.9.197 &mdash; &#1051;&#1080;&#1074;&#1072;&#1081; | &#x263a; 22:28, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete. Wikipedia is not a web guide. &mdash; &#1051;&#1080;&#1074;&#1072;&#1081; | &#x263a; 22:28, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Come on guys what is the problem? Why are sites like eBay and Amazon listed?? THEY are websites.
 * Yes, but those are famous websites whose influence on society has been significant. For example, those are websites that are frequently mentioned in the national and international media. However we can't just go around listing every non-notable message board, fan page and blog out there, because that is not the purpose of an encyclopedia. For every article we must ask ourselves "Is this a generally well-known topic in its field?" If the field is the Internet as in this case, then for the vast majority of individual websites the answer is no. &mdash; &#1051;&#1080;&#1074;&#1072;&#1081; | &#x263a; 22:58, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Why cant we just let this go. If you go to the site you will see it is very active and full of information, very useful. I think it should stay.
 * If there's anything people agree on about Wikipedia policy, it's that it should be applied consistently. We delete articles on websites as non-notable as this on a daily basis, and the consensus has come to be that a website should show some signs of being especially prominent in the Internet community before it is deserving of an encyclopedia article. There are millions of "active" and "useful" webpages out there, and we've decided it's best to leave it up to other projects on the web to document them all. &mdash; &#1051;&#1080;&#1074;&#1072;&#1081; | &#x263a; 23:33, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable web site. Its activity, utility, and information content may make it a great site and one to make a link to from your personal site, but I see nothing about it that belongs in an encyclopedia. &mdash; Knowledge Seeker &#2470; (talk) 01:22, 4 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete: non-notable DCEdwards1966 01:40, Jan 4, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not encyclopedic and Wikipedia is not a web-guide. Rje 02:32, Jan 4, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, expressly violates the rules on not pushing a website on a wikipage. Stirling Newberry 04:14, 4 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as not notable. Hoary 05:57, 2005 Jan 4 (UTC)
 * Delete, nn. A website is not inherently notable or encyclopedic. Wyss 03:15, 5 Jan 2005 (UTC)