Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NeoGAF (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. abakharev 04:46, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

NeoGAF
Renominating after the previous AFD failed to elicit any improvement since then. The article fails to assert its notability and also, as brought up in the previous debate, has absolutely no way to verify any of its statements. Axem Titanium 01:24, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. TJ Spyke 01:42, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Hello32020 02:32, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nothing here is verifiable. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 05:49, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete — unreferenced, not verifiable, not notable, ... Thanks/wangi 15:16, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per all above. --Aaron 18:26, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. wikipediatrix 18:26, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. &mdash; Khoikhoi 00:22, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.