Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NeoPages


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 23:35, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

NeoPages
Non-notable website, alexa ranking of 2,500,000+, no reliable sources on this, doesn't meet WP:WEB or WP:V Xyzzyplugh 23:42, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Akradecki 02:29, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Alexa rankings are BS (based on browsing habits of users of Alexa's spyware) and from my brief Googling it seems they are actually quite big. Cynical 09:47, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
 * "Seems quite big" is not a criterion for inclusion at Wikipedia. What section of WP:WEB does this meet? Daveydw ee b ( chat/patch ) 10:01, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
 * additionally, the forum only has 864 members. Delete RN 10:19, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Doesn't meet WP:WEB. Some P.   E  rson  17:07, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm not convinced of notability, and Cynical's long-running criticism of Alexa, even if true, is not enough in itself to establish notability--only enough to negate non-notability based on the Alexa ranking system. Anyone follow that? AdamBiswanger1R.I.P. Steve Irwin 21:55, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Does not seem very well established website. Notability not asserted, and can probably be speedied. npforums.com has an Alexa rank in the 5.26 millionsth. neopages has 101 links to it; npforums.com has 1. Excepting internal links and wiki mirrors, almost all from digitalmediafx.com, for whom they designed a website. Alexa may not be perfect, but I find it is perfectly good enough to sort the chaff from the wheat. Ohconfucius 09:09, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Adambiswanger1. Yes, I follow completely. Regardless of whether Alexa rankings are reliable, this aritcle fails to establish the notability of its subject. Heimstern Läufer 20:41, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Supermath 22:53, 9 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.