Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neocladura


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Neocladura

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This article has very little information on the subject and it also seem's too minor in order to include as an article on Wikipedia. Joker264 (talk) 03:18, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:12, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:13, 28 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep Encyclopedic topic. Tag for expansion rather than deletion ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 08:58, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Encyclopedic topic. Tag for expansion rather than deletion. Its our duty to ensure that information is  online.  Dr. Blofeld       White cat 10:57, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep all living species; and other levels in the taxonomic tree are notable. Article could be WP:BETTER, but that's no reason to delete. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 07:44, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.