Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neocodex (2)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was  . Mailer Diablo 06:39, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

Neocodex
Was deleted a few months ago, see Articles for deletion/Neocodex. It seems to me that the original reasoning still applies. (However I cannot compare the article with the deleted version) Aleph4 09:46, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, advertising and such. Possibly a speedy candidate as well. WarpstarRider 10:41, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as per recreation of deleted articles. I know some comments were aout nonsense, but many were nn and per nom, which means no cheating. These two still apply.  F e  tofs  Hello! 12:35, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Concur with User:Fetofs -- Simon Cursitor 14:29, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as the site is nn, the entry is an advertisement, and db-repost can be applied. -- Kicking222 14:35, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as repost. --Tango 19:27, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as G4. It should be said, though, that while the site is nn, the justification of several voters at the original AfD that the site promotes cheating and is therefore inherently unencyclopedic, which justification isn't really essayed here, is altogether inconsistent, IMHO, with the relevant criteria for deletion/inclusion.  Joe 20:35, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Agreed. It should be deleted for being nn, a notable cheat site would be perfectly encyclopedic. --Tango 21:06, 20 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete as above. Will tag soon.  Remove it if this is not really a repost.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  18:16, 21 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.