Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neodymium(III) bromide


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Missvain (talk) 01:31, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Neodymium(III) bromide

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This article does not prove notability, consisting only of basic characteristics, and based on Google Scholar, I suspect that there is nothing nontrivial about this compound, aside from routine Raman spectroscopy and mixtures with other compounds. Tagged for notability since December 2016; although the user was later found to be a sockpuppet, there is no reason to believe that this was done in bad faith. Consider this to be precedent for other inorganic compounds, for which I can't find any record in the archive. –LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄ ) 21:53, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 ( d  c̄ ) 21:53, 7 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep I am not aware of a specific notability criteria here, but clicking on the google books links returns LOTS of hits. Would seem to meet WP:GNG Jeepday (talk) 19:13, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per and WP:BEFORE. AfD is not for cleanup, and certainly not for expanding s stub into an article. Bearian (talk) 20:14, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep in support of Jeepday and seeing similar results in my own quick search.--Concertmusic (talk) 22:07, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - meets WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 23:42, 14 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.