Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neogeography (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 02:59, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Neogeography
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Article advertises a Neologism that has not gained wide usage. The sources cited are first party and are unreliable. Alpha Quadrant (talk) 14:34, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - Although an article on this topic was deleted in 2005, this represents an expanded and improved incarnation. No opinion as of now about inclusion-worthiness. Carrite (talk) 15:44, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete No WP:Reliable sources provided. Article isn't even clear about what the term means. Not exactly a neologism (it's apparently been used by various people - it doesn't take much creativity to add "neo-" to a word), but a poorly defined term that has not gained general acceptance. --MelanieN (talk) 15:17, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.