Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neonfly


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 22:53, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Neonfly

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Zero evidence of notability, seems like a vanity page. Google doesn't show any news or other RS on/about them at all. —moonythedwarf (Braden N.) 14:30, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:32, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:32, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak keep as found an album review here at Metal Storm which is a WikiProject Music reliable source but more is needed, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 23:12, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep changing to full keep as have found some extra reliable sources coverage here,here,here,here,here which also shows that they have been on multiple international tours across Europe so have a claim to pass criteria 4 of WP:NMUSIC (only one criteria needed), imv Atlantic306 (talk) 18:44, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:57, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Although the article suffers from bad sourcing, I see enough to pass GNG. Govvy (talk) 20:11, 28 February 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.