Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neopolitan Business Park


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 22:36, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Neopolitan Business Park

 * – ( View AfD View log )

1. no assertion of notability Widefox (talk) 18:36, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:45, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Reasons for deletion

Reasons for deletion include, but are not limited to, the following (subject to the condition that improvement or deletion of an offending section, if practical, is preferable to deletion of an entire page): →This article is about an advertisement but is not advertising
 * Advertising or other spam without relevant content (but not an article about an advertising-related subject)
 * Kj plma (talk) 05:39, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
 * A business park is not an advertising subject, no. Also the objection is not the advert but there is no indication of notability. Widefox (talk) 10:06, 3 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - I can find no coverage about this business park in reliable sources. Al I can find are some rel estate listings. -- Whpq (talk) 16:25, 3 April 2012 (UTC)


 * What happened to the page?
 * Kj plma (talk) 05:40, 4 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - I am sorry for any inconsistency but I am now nominating this article for deletion because someone had done great vandalism on the page.
 * Kj plma (talk) 05:44, 4 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment - Vandalism is not a reason to delete an article, and the vandalism has been reverted. -- Whpq (talk) 13:12, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete The refs effectively amount to a real estate listing and Google Maps; insufficient to demonstrate notability. AllyD (talk) 13:21, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.