Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neosexual


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:56, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Neosexual

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article was prodded last year but someone objected. This neologism totally fails WP:GNG and WP:NEO. The first source is a blog; the second and third are duplicates of each other. A google search finds (1) Wikipedia and mirrors, (2) a couple social scientists who coined it independently with totally different meanings, and (3) a random newspaper dating column and a copy of it. -Crossroads- (talk) 14:54, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. -Crossroads- (talk) 14:54, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. -Crossroads- (talk) 14:54, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. -Crossroads- (talk) 14:54, 29 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete per Crossroads1. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 17:20, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and WP:NOTDICTIONARY —Nizolan (talk · c.) 17:42, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
 * There is a cellular biology meaning, relating to the parasexual cycle. Actual science, and utterly unrelated to the content at hand, of course. &#9786; Uncle G (talk) 19:45, 29 July 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.