Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neosophy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 09:30, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

Neosophy
Appears to be link spam disguised as a dicdef. Delete. &mdash;  F REAK OF N URxTURE  ( [ TALK ] )  09:42, Dec. 17, 2005


 * How about take the links out? Is neosophy not a valid term? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.118.181.83 (talk • contribs) 17 December 2005
 * Comment: if it is a valid term, it should be posted at Wiktionary unless there is potential for encyclopedic expansion. Hopefully we will find out one way or the other in the course of this discussion. &mdash;  F REAK OF N URxTURE  ( [ TALK ] )  11:53, Dec. 17, 2005
 * Delete. --Daveb 11:51, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not in the Oxford English Dictionary or OneLook ∴ not a real word. —Caesura(t) 15:39, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete neologism. --Fire Star 21:26, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Consider further. A word is not a word only because it exits in the Oxford English Dictionary or OneLook, or Websters or CNN. We create with words and we creaate words for those things we wish to explore but have no language yet developed, but developing. Words are sound, pictogram, spelling, meaning, socially applied knowledge. — Preceding unsigned comment added by User:Johnenz (talk • contribs) 19 December 2005
 * Neosophy is a word. It is a Greek compound proper noun. It should be capitalized. It has lineage with two schools of thought from the early 20th Century.Theosophy and Anthroposophy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by User:Johnenz (talk • contribs) 19 December 2005
 * Neither is it in the Encarta World English Dictionary. --Fire Star 06:12, 19 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.