Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nepal Udpidit Jatiya Mukti Samaj


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 21:20, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Nepal Udpidit Jatiya Mukti Samaj

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The content of the article is misleading. Nepal Udpidit Jatiya Mukti Samaj is an organization linked with Nepalese Dalit movement. It is not significant, there is some passing mention about the organization in some documents about Dalit Movements at Nepal. It is not Notable. Chiro725 (talk) 21:02, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - article moved now, and sources revised. Per references the organization is clearly notable, Benedikt (2003) explicitly mentions it as the most influential Dalit movement in Nepal as of the 1990s. See also https://pahar.in/mountains/Books%20and%20Articles/Nepal/2010%20Crime%20Related%20to%20Untouchability%20in%20Nepal%20by%20Mainali%20s.pdf . I'm a bit confused over the 1998/1999 split, it appears that the UML-linked group was the one dropping 'Dalit' from its name (leaving the other group to retain the original name?), but this needs to be explored more in-dept. Presumably the two organizations would have reunited once UML/ML reunited, but that needs a ref. --Soman (talk) 22:01, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 22:33, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 22:33, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:40, 21 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep Revised sourcing seems adequate to establish notability. --Spasemunki (talk) 09:34, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep: I was able to find some mentions in ProQuest, this along with the sources in the article make me think that someone with access to local sources with needed language skills would be able to find even more.   // Timothy ::  talk  02:38, 24 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.