Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nepassa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Mediation case deferred to AFD and the consensus is clear. No need to drag this out. BanyanTree 14:23, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Nepassa

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Disputed speedy. A mediation cabal case has been opened to discuss whether or not it is a hoax, which is more properly a function of AFD, in my opinion. Previously speedied but, given the ruckus, an AFD to determine community consensus is in order. BanyanTree 02:00, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete quite clearly a hoax. Nepassa gets 76 Ghits, "The Lost World Of Nepassa" gets none. Josh Parris
 * Delete per Josh Parris. Edeans 03:04, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - definitely a hoax or something made up in school. The Amish don't use computers either, but if you type Amish into Google information will appear. Natalie 03:05, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete This was speedily delted before, and probably should be speedily deleted again. I also think it should be protected from re-creation. I see no compelling reason for a long discussion. I also agree that it's a hoax.TheRingess (talk) 03:08, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. Unquestionable hoax.  Leaena Jones, the founder?  One hit, a Flixster account.  Gwynaea and Xtayautae, her children?  Zero hits and zero hits again.  Llannbryn, the city in Wales this supposedly took place in?  Zero hits.  Nepassi, the conlang?  5 hits, none of which apply.  I suppose these are preferable to complex hoaxes with forged referencing.  Serpent&#39;s Choice 03:20, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Humans should not play god? That's quite a modern statement. Xiner (talk, email) 04:42, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Seems an obvious hoax. None of the relevant terms gets any relevant google hits, as said above already. Author claims religion is not well known because they don't write about themselves. If it exists and is notable, someone else would have written about it. --Fogeltje 05:01, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt. In deference to the Mediation Cabal, as well as to establish precedent, I will refrain from requesting a speedy. Nevertheless, this is an obvious hoax, and should be deleted. --N Shar 07:14, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Came across this by accident; it reads like an assignment we were given in high school to make up your own religion.Can&#39;t Undo 08:58, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete for Non-Notability and bag the rest of the issues. Whether or not it's a hoax is actually irrelevant, since the article doesn't hold up either way. My addition of the tag just muddied the main issue, which should have always been WP:N. NipokNek 09:51, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Probable hoax. --Soman 10:38, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete This article fails WP:V outright. janejellyroll 11:22, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.