Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nephandi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Mage: The Ascension. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 16:13, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Nephandi

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This article tries to be a game guide and it contains no reliable sources that discuss this material from an out-of-universe perspective as required by WP:WAF. There has to be real-world relevance to aspects of fiction and my online searches can't find any significance of the subject of Nephandi apart from its parent game so the scope of the article fails WP:N. It also dives into much original research and speculation. In essence, this topic hasn't recieved the attention it needs to be the focus of an encyclopedic article that uses reliable sources and not original research, and since the merge tag hasn't been responded to in over a year the best course of action would be to delete this.  Them From  Space  07:06, 14 May 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — A itias  //  discussion  00:01, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  — Them  From  Space  07:13, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge to Mage: The Ascension. Edward321 (talk) 14:21, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Transwiki somewhere else. I'm not sure there'd be much to merge into the Mage article, but that could work too.  Fundamentally, though this piece as it exists now belongs in some other wiki. Jclemens (talk) 17:22, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Redirect to Mage: The Ascension. If there's anything useful to merge, it can be recovered from the redirect's edit history. -- Explodicle (T/C) 18:16, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.