Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nephelim


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   closed as moot. Page has been redirected to Nephilim as a spelling variation, and as a redirect AfD lacks continuing jurisdiction. I can't spell it the same way twice myself, and I like the band. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 20:07, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Nephelim

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Created by an editor recently given an indef block for OR, this seems to be an almost unique spelling for Nephilim - I guess it could be kept as a redirect in case someone mistypes, but then we'd probably want to create Nefilim as well. The lead even spells the name a different way! Neither Google Scholar nor Google books seems to have this as a relevant spelling. dougweller (talk) 18:04, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - I can find no third-party sources for nomads called Nephelim. The second section of that article is just the passage quoted in the Nephilim article. This might be an attempt at a hoax. I would probably keep the redirect to Nephilim as it seems to be a common misspelling. §FreeRangeFrog 18:21, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Nephilim. To judge by the Google hits, it seems to be a common enough misspelling. Nefilim (about something else) already exists, with a hatnote directing readers to Nephilim. Deor (talk) 19:21, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Nephilim. As a side note, for a case like this I think an AfD is overkill, I would favor in cases like this, just making the page into a redirect...no need for discussion.  Cazort (talk) 19:43, 12 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.