Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nephrology Times


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete, consensus is that the article fails the notability guidelines. Davewild (talk) 21:03, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Nephrology Times

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

A new startup magazine. Only 21 unique G-hits, none of them reliable, no particular proof of notability. Moreover, in looking over the hits, almost all have the same language as this article, suggesting that this is a press release being copied to site after site. Fails WP:N, WP:V.  RGTraynor  06:44, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable. The article also has poor referencing, most aren't third party sources. Pro bug catcher (talk • contribs). 21:33, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  22:59, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  22:59, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per lack of notability. Artene50 (talk) 04:36, 6 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.