Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nerds in Disguise


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:16, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

Nerds in Disguise

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Someone tried to AFD this but didn't finish the job. And as usual, I'm the only person on the whole project who can be arsed to fix redlink AFDs. Questionable notability, minimal sources. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 18:54, 5 August 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. I have no idea why you keep insisting that you're the only person who fixes redlinked AfDs, I fix them whenever I see them. Have a cup of tea and relax. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 21:03, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * It was performed by an IP, that's why. I think this is kind of a BLP1E case where all their notability hinges on the contest, so Delete. Raymie Humbert (t • c) 19:02, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:43, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete primary (well, ok, only) claim to notability is winning a Pepsi contest we don't have an article on. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  13:27, 12 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - Won a contest? Not encyclopedia worthy... Carrite (talk) 06:36, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.