Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nerdy Numbers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  → Call me  Hahc  21  02:49, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Nerdy Numbers

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable, not even in worldcat. No valid references  DGG ( talk ) 01:25, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete This book fails our notability guideline for books.  Cullen 328  Let's discuss it  03:07, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. I can't find enough to justify an article for all three books, let alone one. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   08:04, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:41, 28 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. At a minimum, we have required that books be listed in Worldcat in order to pass WP:BOOKS. Bearian (talk) 22:15, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.