Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nerva (artist)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:38, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Nerva (artist)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Contested Prod, following which the biography now carries basic references. However there is no indication that the subject meets the notability guidelines for artists. AllyD (talk) 09:32, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. Passes the general notability guideline with significant coverage in the independent reliable sources referenced in our article and the Estonian Wikipedia article. Phil Bridger (talk) 10:37, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
 * What are these? The en article has 2 webpages (2003 and 2005) from the same Latvian website, possibly connected with a newspaper, or not, with an interview & a short story. That's not enough by a long stretch. Johnbod (talk) 03:10, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * If you follow the link provided in those citations you will see that the source is Postimees, Estonia's highest circulation newspaper, and, as I said above, there are plenty more such reliable sources referenced in the Estonian Wikipedia article. Phil Bridger (talk) 09:59, 15 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. WP:PROMO by single-purpose account User:Flasher T. --bender235 (talk) 15:03, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:58, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:59, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete no assertion of notability; just local exhibitions. Johnbod (talk) 03:06, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete no assertion of notability; just misc. exhibitions; no awards; missing significant coverage in the independent reliable sources referenced; etc. feydey (talk) 12:53, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.