Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nescism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy delete g3 vandalism, g1 nonsense, WP:NFT, WP:SNOW. NawlinWiki 14:01, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Nescism

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Violates WP:SOAP, and WP:COI (written by the founder). It's also unreferenced, and not notable. Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. Speedy possible? Rocket000 03:12, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete for being barefaced nonsense. Eddie.willers 03:25, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
 * BJAODN, easily. Though, I wonder if the author of this drivel was trying to be immortalized therein. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 03:36, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Consign to the realm of un-knowledge, as the only poetic response to an article of this caliber. Also, incidentally, no reliable sources - though, again, the subject really is unsourceable, intentionally so. ZZ Claims~ Evidence 04:24, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: WHAT? It is an unreferenced thing made up one day / original research. - Rjd0060 04:47, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete with a vengeance. Utter nonsense. Alberon 10:16, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: Nonsense, move to /dev/null. Andante1980 10:34, 12 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.