Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nessesidy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  Sango 123  23:42, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Nessesidy
Apparently this comic doesn't even exist? Nothing on Google for 'Nessesidy Sabrina'. User:Zoe|(talk) 02:23, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. By the article's creator this comic doesn't exist anywhere on the web. "No profit is made from Nessesidy and it is not displayed anywhere else therefor this is not a promotion nor a webcomic." In fact, it seems like this is original comicbookery wherein the article's creator is using Wikipedia as something akin to a free web host. It's non-notable, original research (uh, sort of), and unverifiable. --FreelanceWizard 02:28, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails the Google test no matter how I search. However, any way you cut it, I must give strong credit to the creators of this article -- this is very elaborate for being fake... kind of humorous as well.  Seems like they wanted to see if they could sneak something totally random (but well-written) by.  BJAODN? Czj 02:30, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not really funny enough for BJAODN. Unverifiable and nonexistent. --Core des at talk. ^_^ 03:03, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per all above. Erechtheus 03:04, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. -- Gogo Dodo 05:18, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete —  WP:NFT Betacommand 05:23, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I had earlier prodded it, but in retrospect a db-nocontext was provided for, since the first section was not on the article at that time. (No longer, though.) Same reasons as everyone else. Morgan Wick 06:00, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, unverifiable. -- Dragonfiend 06:23, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom  WP:NFT Ohconfucius 07:35, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Doesn't even exist! Obviously nn. rootology (T) 08:46, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable. Do we get to keep the images? --HResearcher 12:11, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable (fake) webcomic, vanity article. J I P  | Talk 18:04, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. - Paulus89 20:49, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, this could probably qualify as a speedy delete as a vanity page. --chemica 06:45, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator, the subject does not appear to exist. Yamaguchi先生 23:05, 8 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.