Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nested (disambiguation)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Close as delete. As indicated, process is to delete incorrectly created disamb pages.  SilkTork  ✔Tea time  15:35, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Nested (disambiguation)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Red link. Article should be written first, and then the WP:Disambiguation page. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 01:40, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per WP:G6 ("a disambiguation page that only links to one extant article and whose title includes '(disambiguation)'"). I'd also add that even if/when the second article is created, no disambiguation page is needed or should be created.  With only two articles, it should be handled via a hatnote; see WP:TWODABS. TJRC (talk) 01:08, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete or redirect to Nest (disambiguation). Odd creation.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:54, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Agree with bd2412 below. Plausible, and redirects are cheap.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:08, 15 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Merge to Nest (disambiguation). It is highly plausible that someone could look for something that is "nested" without having the obscure album in mind. bd2412  T 03:03, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per G6. Who's going to type in "Nested (disambiguation)"? If you really must, then a hatnote in Nested to Nest (disambiguation) would be a better alternative, but I don't like either option. Nested is already listed in the See also section of Nest (disambiguation). That's just right. Clarityfiend (talk) 06:47, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 16 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Merge to Nest (disambiguation) as a good compromise. These entries can be "nested" there until/unless a separate disambiguation becomes necessary. -- Tavix ( talk ) 17:15, 17 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.