Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nestoria


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. Deathphoenix ʕ 20:02, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Nestoria
Freshly launched website. Only vague claims of notability. Haakon 14:52, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete -- be notable first, get on WP second -- MrDolomite 14:55, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. Article appears to be about a relatively unknown website with little info. Dbertman 14:55, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:WEB. Alexa rank is 126,280 and no claims of notability. - Tangot a ngo 15:18, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * comment: Alexa ranking of 100,000 is not considered notable? --Zandarx talk 15:37, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: 126k is about as low as you can go. Only-thing worse would be no rating. ---J.S (t|c) 16:05, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Reply: I take that back... you can infact get much lower. Nevermind that point:) ---J.S (t|c) 16:52, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: On a side note: if you narrow the ranking average to just the last month they actually score around 10k-15k. Still NN for now.---J.S (t|c) 16:07, 23 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete as NN per nom but without prejudice against recreation latter. ---J.S (t|c) 16:05, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Reply: Not sure how to use this for editing, but I came accross this on a blog I read and googled/wikipediad it and felt obliged to post here. You could look at: http://technorati.com/search/nestoria I subscribe to brain off.
 * comment: Hey guys - sorry to have caused a problem here. Honestly didn't know exactly what a site needed to be considered notable! If you want to take it down, I'm more than happy for you to - if you can give me some idea of what might be considered notable (in your personal opinions - i've now read the somewhat unclear guidelines) then that would be even more useful! I'm very busy this weekend (and indeed at the moment), so I'm happy to leave it to you for now, but if you can somehow leave comments, that would be great. Again, apologies. PS If you hadn't guessed, I'm new to this. Ahmedbadrnestoria
 * WP:N has general notability guidelines, and WP:WEB has guidelines relevant to websites. Haakon 20:29, 23 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete, fails WP:WEB. --Coredesat 20:52, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: It's all a matter of how you define notability. A search in Google for 'nestoria' reveals a number of mentions in geocoding and realestate blogs across the world. The main reason is that they support open source software and people consider them a relatively good blend of Web 2.0 technology and user exprience. As far as the Alexa ranking goes, we all know what it is "supposed" to denote and that it actually does: nothing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Denaxas (talk • contribs)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.