Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Net-90


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Note also the consent of the article's author, SilyOlPooh, who is the article's only substantial contributor. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:46, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Net-90

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Net-90 invoicing is a common form of Bill of Sale in retail publishing. Nearly all general book retail in the United States is sold using Net-30, Net-45, or Net-90 invoicing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Susiequesie (talk • contribs)
 * That doesn't explain anything about why you want this article deleted. What's your rationale for deletion of this article, based in Deletion policy, exactly? Uncle G (talk) 04:37, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The article claims Mr Ball created "Net-90" as a system of business when it is not and he did not. Nothing about the article was correct, accurate, or cited (or noteworthy if the other three had been).  I worked with Mr Ball and his company and nothing about his invoicing model was different than any other book reseller would have been given by the major houses, excepting possibly a more generous credit line. That's this New York lady's opinion anyway.  Perhaps you will disagree.  --Susiequesie (talk) 05:36, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Why, exactly, is boldly editing the article to become correct, accurate, and cited, per Deletion policy, not an option? Uncle G (talk) 10:09, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete without prejudice. I hesitate to supply a rationale when none is given, but this unreferenced article does seem to be about a non-notable business method that apparently involves purchasing goods on credit and reselling them for cash.  It also seems to be part of a promotional walled garden involving Rich Ball and The Page's Edge.  - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:28, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable. Already better covered by Discounts and allowances, by this logic we should have Net-15, Net-30 and Net-60 as they are more common in industry.  Burzmali (talk) 17:18, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Agreed it is better covered, as noted above. --SilyOlPooh (talk) 07:49, 15 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.