Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Net4 (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 09:36, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

Net4
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No major secondary sources talking about company history, company is now defunct and services have been transferred. Most major news articles are referencing the shutdown.

This is the second nomination, the first nomination is at Articles_for_deletion/Net4 but I disagree with these findings. TheForgottenKing (talk) 07:21, 3 March 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  12:30, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Internet,  and India. North America1000 08:02, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not enough news coverage to meet notability. Chelokabob (talk) 00:23, 4 March 2022 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE Extraordinary Writ (talk) 19:09, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep appears to have enough sourcing to pass GNG. Iamreallygoodatcheckers (talk) 05:53, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete: per nom. Sources I could find are about the company's bankruptcy and closure. The available sources doesn't look very reliable too. - SUN EYE 1  16:36, 12 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete This is a company/organization therefore WP:NCORP guidelines apply and requires multiple sources (at least two) of deep or significant coverage with in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) contains "Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. Mentions-in-passing are not "in-depth". None of the references in the article meet the criteria and I can't find any, topic fails WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 10:42, 15 March 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.