Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NetDecision

NetDecision
was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was

Blatant advertisement. Cut and paste from the product's website. . older &ne; wiser 12:51, Oct 29, 2004 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * I took out the copyvio advertising, which leaves one sentence. Still, delete - DavidWBrooks 13:20, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Ambi 13:22, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. --*drew 13:23, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. ---Cyprus2k1 13:26, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Don't delete.This page does not contain advertisement material. It is pure technical and describes the architecture of the product. So I vote against its deletion.
 * Sign your vote or it doesn't count. --Improv 13:29, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * It's an anon, it doesn't count anyway. anthony &#35686;&#21578; 20:55, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Another software product hoping for free advertising. Anon contributor has no contributions other than this article, the unsigned vote above, and a premature listing of this article on votes for undeletion. Andrewa 14:20, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, advertising -- Sietse 14:44, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. Advertising was removed. anthony &#35686;&#21578; 16:51, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Advertising. We had a long article that was 100% advertising. 90% of the article has been removed, leaving.... a short article that is 100% advertising. In my opinion. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 18:09, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Comment: Exactly. No change of vote. Andrewa 20:56, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * What makes this advertising? It's NPOV information about a product.  You might not like the product, but I don't see how that makes it advertising any more than any of the other articles we have on products. anthony &#35686;&#21578; 20:54, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * That's your judgement, and your vote. My judgement is that it's advertising and my vote is to delete. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 23:28, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Advert. --Improv 13:29, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Del. A list of compatible software is not "architecture". No evidence of notability -- nor any significant info. --Jerzy(t) 23:05, 2004 Nov 3 (UTC)