Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NetGain Technologies


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tone 23:11, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

NetGain Technologies

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional article for small computer service company. The refs are uniformly public relations, and "top 250 " of anything is not notability. The listing of every executive, every branch office, every routine certification, and every possible service in the infobox is characteristic of promotional articles. Accepted from AfC, which is no surprise.  DGG ( talk ) 18:23, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete A local firm going about its business, providing "solutions for business problems" and gathering industry listings, but no evidence that it is of encyclopaedic notability. AllyD (talk) 19:50, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 03:34, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 03:34, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kentucky-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 03:34, 28 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - No significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. Mostly primary sources and press release reprints /rehashes are being presented as sources.  Aside from that, there are short snippet news blips about their acquisition of a rival.  No enough to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 17:43, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.