Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NetHelpDesk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MelanieN (talk) 00:43, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

NetHelpDesk

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable product. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:40, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2016 February 8.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 19:01, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak delete - Possible notability for the award it received but the subject is not covered in reliable sources and page reads like a puff piece. Meatsgains (talk) 19:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment This "award" is a certification process by one company. It's neither notable and from the website for it, not difficult to obtain. 208.81.212.224 (talk) 21:41, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  Musa  Talk  00:15, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  Musa  Talk  00:15, 9 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete at best as this is not yet solidly notable. SwisterTwister   talk  06:28, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:59, 12 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete The article is about a company, not a product, but regardless, it does not seem to have yet the needed in-depth coverage from independent reliable sources to establish its notability. The award is not enough to meet WP:CORP and most of the references are not independent and the rest are standard mentions, no in-depth coverage.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 23:54, 12 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.