Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NetLingo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  12:15, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

NetLingo

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Besides the WSJ piece back in 2009, everything else are just fleeting mentions. Does not meet the multiple (and/or) sustained in-depth coverage bar for GNG. Sohom (talk) 09:16, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language, Companies, Internet,  and Websites. Sohom (talk) 09:19, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - Even the reference from The New York Times fails WP:ORGCRIT. I cannot locate anything in a search to show how this would meet notability guidelines. --CNMall41 (talk) 06:22, 31 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.