Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NetSupport Manager (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. (non-admin closure) Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 17:06, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

NetSupport Manager
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete Advertising pure and simple. By an editor (Special:Contributions/ALKINGSLEY) with no other edits. AlistairMcMillan (talk) 18:17, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:Advert.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 18:52, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. This very brief article about a remote desktop manager makes absolutely no showing of importance. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:11, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  22:43, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. I've added a reference. This software has been around for a while, so likely more references can be found (especially for earlier versions). Also, this article is an objective one sentence stub, so I don't seen what the cries of "advertisement" are based on. VG &#x260E; 19:11, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete entirely nonnotable. Also note the first AfD back in 2006.  Themfromspace (talk) 22:27, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Consensus can change. The previous AfD indicated that this software could be notable, but it was deleted due to lack of references. VG &#x260E;
 * Comment. I've added 3 more references. VG &#x260E; 23:27, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep I read the article and see an extremely concise description of the product, but I don't see any advertising whatsoever. The sources added by VG demonstrate in depth coverage over this century, which satisfies the Wikipedia notability standard. Article needs expansion, not deletion. Alansohn (talk) 04:03, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, insufficient information to prove notability. Stifle (talk) 08:46, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep for now - let's give the WP:RESCUE guys a chance. Bettia   (rawr CRUSH!)  11:55, 7 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.