Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NetWhoring


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete... Author blanked etc. Tawker 04:52, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

NetWhoring
Contested ProD. Non-notable neologism. 29 unique ghits. WP:NOT a dictionary. --  I sl a y So lo mo n  |  t a l k  03:00, 25 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:NEO.-- Hús  ö  nd  03:18, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Comments?
 * I deleted the article Netwhoring already.
 * "if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:NetWhoring"
 * That's funny, because you never raised any issues on Talk:Netwhoring at all. You put crap on my homepage instead.
 * Next time you want to delete an article, raise you objections on the talk page of the page in dispute. Do not address the author personally. Also, it may help if you actually "discuss" your objections, and "read" the content to see if the issue is the content of the article or the name of the article, and if so, what constructive feedback, if any, you may have to share.
 * Delete this section after reading. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DougHolton (talk • contribs) 03:36, 25 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment DougHolton blanked this discussion page and left the above message, he also blanked the article. -- I sl a y So lo mo n  |  t a l k  03:47, 25 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete as CSD G7. The "crap" I added to DougHolton's "user page" were the and  templates. I added them to his talk page. --  I sl a y So lo mo n  |  t a l k  04:10, 25 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.