Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Net Element


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 19:47, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Net Element

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

highly promotional article, dealing in detail with non-encyclopedic business details of a barely notable company. Please consider also the adjacent AfDs on its CEO.  DGG ( talk ) 09:44, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:04, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:05, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:05, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:06, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:36, 25 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:MILL. I've worked in school buildings with more employees - in fact, I was a group leader at a bank and we worked in a room with more employees than this company. Most years I have taught (whether college or secondary schools) I had more than twice as many students as this company has employees. Bearian (talk) 20:44, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: An article describing a company and its products in often promotional terms ("next generation cloud-based point of sale payments platform", "a leading provider", "comprehensive turnkey, payment-processing solutions", "value-added transaction services", etc.) - overall a text suitable for a corporate website. Such issues might be resolved by a substantial rewrite, but while I can see sporadic discussion of the company's share price, I don't see evidence that the company is notable. AllyD (talk) 15:24, 2 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.