Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Netburner


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:57, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Netburner
Blatant advertising, spam Montco 00:44, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per WP:Vanity. SorryGuy 01:19, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:CORP; spamvertisement. Bucketsofg 01:34, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete advertisement. Sheehan (Talk) 02:37, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete advert.ßlηguγΣη | Have your say!!! 02:55, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, adad --Deville (Talk) 03:27, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete an advert it is. LookNorth 03:58, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, obvious advertising --Mason 04:10, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete as obvious and shameless advertising. Come back when you're paying Wikipedia to host this. J I P  | Talk 05:57, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete An obvious piece of advertising. -- S iva1979 Talk to me  09:42, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, spam, advertisement. --Ter e nce Ong 10:41, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete cannot be anything but vanity from the company. Ans  e  ll  13:24, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Advertising. --TheKoG (talk|contribs) 13:26, 13 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Obvious cleanup to remove advertising and keep. Big company. Pcb21 Pete 13:59, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete if someone removes the advertising maybe a keep.--Tollwutig 15:26, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Looks like the author has blanked the page, should it be nominated under then? --TheKoG (talk|contribs) 19:36, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - blank -- getcrunk   juice  contribs 22:21, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I have to ask why this one wasn't speedied in the first place, however, it getting to this page should be enough to say that it should not be blanked. A policy on blanking AfD's is still in discussion. Ans  e  ll  00:12, 14 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete, per above.Freddie 02:04, 15 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.