Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neteller


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 19:33, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Neteller

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Originally prodded by me under the following rationale, which I think is still valid: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (companies) requirement." Deprodded by anon with the following edit summary: "Opposed deletion, suggested redirecting and possibly merging this to Optimal Payments". I don't think that much can be merged there, however, as that company is about as unnotable as this - see Articles for deletion/Optimal Payments. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 05:58, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 03:18, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 03:18, 12 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:18, 18 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep - they actually sponsor English Premier League side Crystal Palace FC, their name is emblazoned on their shirts and hence are on TV every week. Online ticket purchases for matches go through them. They are obviously pretty noteworthy. Tris2000 (talk) 14:16, 24 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ⨹   02:56, 25 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. When the founders are charged with facilitating "the transfer of billions of dollars of illegal gambling proceeds from United States citizens to the owners of various internet gambling companies located overseas" by the United States Attorney, Southern District of New York,, we're talking big business. Clarityfiend (talk) 10:56, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.