Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nethakani


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  MBisanz  talk 01:02, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Nethakani

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No references support the notability of this occupation or group. Ghits are ambiguous. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 20:23, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Few hits on google to indicate notability of this technique Lets  drink Tea 20:36, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Do you mean to say it is a specific weaving technique? If it is, we might be able to write something about that in a relevant weaving article and redirect. - Mgm|(talk) 09:31, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Nethakani is not a weaving technique. It is a caste whose members were trditional weavers. Salih  ( talk ) 10:52, 25 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. I found a single reference on a Google Scholar search to a 1996 paper, which isn't really enough. Bondegezou (talk) 13:49, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep based on the expanded article. Bondegezou (talk)
 * Keep I have expanded and referenced the article. Request previous reviewers to take another look at the revised article. Abecedare (talk) 23:51, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, X  clamation point  03:41, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This was relisted because the article was just updated yesterday, and did not give the delete voters much time to reconsider. X clamation point  03:43, 1 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep based on the expansion and referencing. Umbralcorax (talk) 03:59, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Sufficient sourcing. Probably most castes will turn out to be notable if the work is done.DGG (talk) 01:37, 2 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.