Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Netspert


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 07:05, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

Netspert
Incorrectly nominated for a speedy. This is neologism, though googling gets approximately 7,310 hits. This term is too new to be included here. --Deathphoenix 19:46, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete My bad. I originally nominated it for speedy.  As written, the author uses the first person, to me that seems inappropriate for an Encyclopedia article.  If someone wants to do some major rework, let them.  Otherwise, remove it. BTW, I think we are going to need a neologism in the future similar to google bombing, for when a bunch of bloggers discover that they can create a "notable" word by simply writing it all the time.   Wikipedipulation.TheRingess 19:49, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Original research, no sources provided. Use of first person is not appropriate in an encyclopedia article. &mdash;the preceding unsigned comment is by Zachary Murray (talk &bull; contribs)
 * Delete as complete bollocks. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 20:42, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. &#126;MDD4696 23:12, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable unverifiable recent neologism. --Quarl 02:05, 29 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.