Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nett Solutions, Inc.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete.  (aeropagitica)   (talk)   05:23, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Nett Solutions, Inc.
Was deleted via prod, reposted. Spam. Petros471 22:31, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. See also Carl Hagmier nomination below.  He's the CEO of the company.  Starry  Eyes  22:55, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete spam ST47 22:59, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete —  spam M  a  rtinp23  23:30, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as spam. Prolog 00:13, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - spam - Richardcavell 01:53, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - What's the vendetta you have against this guy StarryEyes? Seems legit to me.  User: CBSonoma
 * Note: Third- and fourth-ever edits by User:Cbsonoma. The first and second ones are below.  No other contribs.  Note that he refers to "this guy" when the article in question is about the company.  Note also a certain CBSonoma has posted elsewhere about Hagmier: .  As for my "vendetta", I wasn't the one who nominated this article, and I treat all non-notable articles the same way, Mr. Hagmier Sonoma.    Starry  Eyes  02:41, 18 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete Was deleted before and reposted.  Company fails WP:CORP.  Speedy seems glaringly appropriate.  Dipics 03:10, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The article was deleted after an admin deleted it from an uncontested prod. I take that to mean that the author disputes the prod but is not familiar with wikipedia process. Lack of notability is a valid reason for speedying, however. - Richardcavell 04:41, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per Dipics. Dave Null 15:21, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: I could have probably got away with an WP:IAR speedy deletion as spam, but it doesn't actually meet any speedy deletion criteria. CSD G4 (recreation) does not apply, because recreation of an article deleted via prod automatically counts as a contested prod. A7 does not apply for companies. Hence this afd. Petros471 15:52, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.