Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nettech Ltd


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:47, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Nettech Ltd

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Insufficient evidence of notability. Nearly a speedy deletion candidate under WP:A7, but "In 2013, it was rated by Sunday times as the fastest growing small business." does constitute a credible claim of significance. However, it's not a sufficient indicator of notability by itself, and it also lacks a source (the reference attached to that statement is unrelated). Besides that, there's nothing on the page to indicate notability. Iago Qnsi (talk) 22:47, 14 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - this is one of a batch of pretty near identical articles differing only in their titles. See Johny Walker and Sons and Sunwest Solutions - this looks like a hoax farm or paid editing or something similar.  Velella  Velella Talk 23:23, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails notability and looks like hoax. JackTracker (talk) 00:53, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per all the above. I also think Nettech is related as the creator (User:Jonesandrew848) is a sock of User:Maqs1231, who is currently blocked. Jonesandrew848 has also edited Nettech. ··· 日本穣 ·  投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe ·  Join WP Japan ! 03:46, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Other probably-related articles include Swapan Purkait (seems like obvious marketing spam), IMI Kolkata (rather spammy), and Arindam Banik (spammy). A little unsure about Tirthapati Institution, but it seems non-notable. ··· 日本穣 ·  投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe ·  Join WP Japan ! 03:53, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
 * See Articles for deletion/Swapan Purkait. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:31, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:27, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:27, 15 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as this was literally speedied as both no claims of significance and advertising only yesterday and both times it was blatant, thus showing not only the sheer consistency and blatancy, but how we need to take it seriously and save ourselves the time and efforts of another deletion and damaged articlespace (which is not tolerant of such unconvincing materials). SwisterTwister   talk  04:52, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt: A WP:SPA article sourced to business listings and the company's blog. The apparent claim to notability through a Sunday Times award is sourced to - a local Yellow Pages listing. Nothing reliable; fails WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 09:53, 16 November 2016 (UTC)


 *  Should not be Deleted  But improved further with any relevant sources possible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Soomromoid (talk • contribs) 11:00, 16 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete, same as Sunwest Solutions. Salt. FoCuS contribs ;  talk to me!  13:39, 16 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.